AKA the X step process to showing that your business idea doesn’t suck
The null hypothesis is that no one will use your product and no one cares about your company.
Â
“70% of upstart tech companies fail — usually around 20 months after first raising financing” (CB Insights) and, in general, 90% of start-ups fail (Forbes)
Â
Top 12 reasons found by CB Insights (and aggregated into three buckets by me)
- 75% Flawed Business Model / Regulatory Challenges / Ran out of cash
- 45% No Market Need or wrong timing
- 47% Bad execution: wrong team, poor product, out competed or burned out
Further Reading
Here are 406 Post Mortems of Start-ups
Â
If we can test the Market Need and Business Model, perhaps we can increase the probability of success from 10% to over 50%!
Â
If we can test out ideas quickly enough and cheaply enough, then we test several ideas before we find one that works.
![notion image](https://www.notion.so/image/https%3A%2F%2Fi.pinimg.com%2Foriginals%2F7e%2F85%2F13%2F7e8513484933babfdafdcf0f564b9328.gif?table=block&id=29aed2f6-464f-4ee0-ac96-d99cf7f43556&cache=v2)
How is this different than just following the Lean Startup or building an MVP?
Do not try to show you have a GOOD IDEA, you prove that it is NOT A BAD IDEA
Â
The biggest issue with most of these approaches is that that all want to VALIDATE your idea. Essentially you have a thing and you talk to users to see if they like the thing.
Â
By looking to show that your idea is bad, you cast a wide net searching for flaws in your business model. You look for cracks in your user’s behavior.
Read more about your “Not a Bad Idea”
Not a Bad Idea - The Constanza Approach to the Lean StartupÂ
Feedback
I think this article could be better, reach out on Twitter and I’ll make it better
Â